
This year, resolve not to kill yourself with poor decisions |
As we ring in the new year, millions of people are expected to make resolutions to improve their lives. A Duke University researcher says the consequences of some personal decisions provide important reasons to stick to those vows in the coming year. New research conducted by Fuqua Professor Ralph L. Keeney concludes that personal decisions lead to more than one million premature deaths annually in the U.S. Keeney’s work, published in the current issue of the INFORMS journal Operations Research, shows that personal decisions are the leading cause of death in the U.S. if one takes into account the role of obesity and smoking in creating heart disease and cancer, the primary causes of death in the U.S. “Previous researchers have identified the main causes of heart disease and cancer as smoking and being overweight, each of which results in over 400,000 deaths annually,” Keeney said. With the number of personal choices made in a given day, many individuals don’t take a step back to look at the long-term implications of those choices, Keeney said. From having unprotected sex to not buckling the seatbelt before driving, many of these decisions can eventually result in death. Other personal decisions that lead to significant premature deaths include overconsumption of alcohol, reckless driving, homicide and suicide. Keeney’s results showed that more than 55 percent of all deaths for individuals aged 15 to 64 can be attributed to personal decisions that have readily available alternatives. “Given that the impacts of smoking and being overweight start taking a heavy toll in the mid-30s, I wasn’t surprised with this result for people over 35,” Keeney said. “However, I was surprised that more than 55 percent of the deaths to individuals 15 to 24 years old could be avoided with different easy-to-make personal decisions. For many of these individuals, more than 40 years of potential productive life is lost.” Keeney said individuals have a great deal of control over their own mortality. His research also shows that individuals don’t always need to rely on others, including government, hospitals and nonprofit organizations, to make their lives safer, because they can easily take effective action to make their own lives and those of their families safer. Common sense lifesaving choices include: avoiding smoking, drinking alcohol in moderation, exercising regularly, driving sober and abiding by the speed limit, not using illicit drugs and practicing safe sex. |

I agree and respect this New Research from Professor Keeney.
However, we need to understand that Life is an experiment to find out what works best for us. We also need to be concius about our choices and responsible about our actions because we all looking for a purpose and conection in our life.
We need to gather information from within ourself and other sources to learn about those available alternatives before making a decision.
We need to educate people about the importance and benefits of well develop decision making process to live better.
Andres Alvarez
Miami, Fl
Maybe the answer is revealed in Professor Keeney’s publication, but it occurs to me that the validity of the quantitative message here (55% of deaths today vs 5% in 1900) might be compromised by the underlying methods used to collect and report the causes of death, not to mention the societal and cultural changes over this 100+ year span. For example, the advent of penicillin as the first highly effective antibiotic effectively dramatically reduced the number of people dying from infections diseases in this age group while allowing other diseases implicated as “life choices” to have a more insidious impact on emerging causes of death, e.g., cardiovascular diseases. So I’m not sure that I can accept the magnitude of the increase in deaths attributed to “life choices” as valid, but I certainly accept the point that daily decisions about our health have cumulative implications for longevity.
The most important takeaway message is that “common sense” is never so “common” nor as “sensible” as the ideal.